HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY
Ent vs Noma: AI endpoint control facts side by side
Short answer
By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11
Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.
Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13
Where do their controls sit?
- Filled or hatched marker: Ent
- Dashed teal ring: Noma, described
- DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
- DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
- DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
What are the facts, side by side?
| Fact | Ent | Noma |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | None | None |
| Positioning | An intent-aware AI endpoint: one programmable policy for people and AI agents, with interventions from a soft nudge to a hard block, an on-device small language model that classifies sensitive data, and investigation timelines written in plain language. Use cases: insider risk, last-mile threats such as ClickFix, AI usage control and data security. | An AI security platform with AI-SPM, Agent Access Control, AI detection and response and AI red teaming, covering agents on endpoints, in SaaS and in homegrown apps. |
| How it reaches devices | A single lightweight agent across Windows, macOS, Linux and modern browsers, run as SaaS or self-hosted in your own cloud; rollout through MDM is not stated. Source: Ent press: intent-aware prevention for AI agents, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Discovers endpoint agents through your existing EDR or MDM, with no new endpoint agent to deploy. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| On-device control | DescribedA single lightweight agent across Windows, macOS and Linux with one programmable policy for people and AI agents. Source: Ent press: intent-aware prevention for AI agents, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | DescribedDiscovers endpoint agents such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex with their MCP servers and skills, blocks unauthorized and malicious ones, and inspects activity at runtime. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Browser extensionDiffers | DescribedBrowser-extension deployments generally available at launch. Source: Ent press: $100M seed, 16 June 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Network or SSE proxy | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| AI or MCP gateway | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. | Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read. |
| Names the coding agents it covers | MatchesNames OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Claude Cowork, GitHub Copilot and Cursor. Source: Ent press: intent-aware prevention for AI agents, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | MatchesNames Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Decides on a tool call before it runs | PartlyBlocks risky agent behavior where needed; per-tool-call mechanics are not described. Source: Ent press: intent-aware prevention for AI agents, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | PartlyRuntime inspection of the event, the session, the identity behind the agent and the data it reaches; decisions on individual tool calls are described less specifically. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Controls what goes into browser AIDiffers | PartlyClassifies sensitive data at the point of use on the device and in browsers; prompt-level controls are not detailed. Source: Ent press: intent-aware prevention for AI agents, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Not in our sources |
| Rolls out through EDR or device management you runDiffers | Not in our sources | MatchesThrough your existing EDR or MDM, with no new endpoint agent. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Can warn or ask instead of only blockingDiffers | MatchesInterventions range from a soft nudge to a hard block. Source: Ent homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026 | PartlyStates that runtime decisions can route to a human. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents (re-read) · Read 13 Oct 2026 |
| Can block an agent, tool or action | MatchesA hard block is one of its interventions. Source: Ent homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026 | MatchesBlocks unauthorized and malicious agents. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Has a watch-only or simulation mode | Not in our sources | Not in our sources |
| Records who or what took each actionDiffers | MatchesNatural-language investigation timelines. Source: Ent press: intent-aware prevention for AI agents, 30 July 2026 · Read 13 Oct 2026 | PartlyKeeps a live registry of allowed agents, MCP servers and skills and inspects the identity behind each agent. Source: Noma Security: endpoint agents · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIDiffers | Not in our sources | MatchesCovers endpoint, SaaS and homegrown agents. Source: Noma Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace)Differs | Not in our sources | MatchesAWS Marketplace lists the Noma Security Platform at $200,000 for a 12-month contract (marketplace list price); noma.security has no pricing page. Source: AWS Marketplace: Noma Security Platform · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
| Built into | None | None |
| Works with | None in our sources | None in our sources |
| Price | Not published (demo request). Source: Ent homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026 | Marketplace list price: $200,000 for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace. No pricing page on noma.security. Source: AWS Marketplace: Noma Security Platform · Read 11 Oct 2026 |
Where do they differ?
- Browser extension: Ent describes it; Noma is not in our sources.
- Controls what goes into browser AI: Ent partly matches; Noma is not in our sources.
- Rolls out through EDR or device management you run: Ent is not in our sources; Noma matches.
- Can warn or ask instead of only blocking: Ent matches; Noma partly matches.
- Records who or what took each action: Ent matches; Noma partly matches.
- Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AI: Ent is not in our sources; Noma matches.
- Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace): Ent is not in our sources; Noma matches.
Choose Ent if
- You want one policy for people and AI agents, with nudges as well as blocks
- You need device and browser coverage from one agent
Choose Noma if
- Agents run on laptops, in SaaS and in apps you build, and you want one place to see them
- You want discovery through existing EDR or MDM without a new agent
Which limits should you check?
Ent
- Per-tool-call mechanics and rollout through MDM are not described on the pages we read.
- Uses its own agent, and no price is published.
Noma
- A watch-only or simulation mode is not described on the pages we read.
- Decisions on individual tool calls are described less specifically than discovery, and the only public price is a $200,000 a year marketplace listing.