Skip to content
Endpoint AI Finder

HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY

Bay vs Prompt Security: AI endpoint control facts side by side

Short answer

Bay describes 1 of the four product control types on the pages we read and Prompt Security describes 2; they differ on browser extension. On decisions, Bay decides on a tool call before it runs and Prompt Security does not describe tool-call decisions on the pages we read. We do not score either; the right choice depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, your current stack and whether you block or guide.

By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13

Where do their controls sit?

Bay: described at 1 of 4 product control positions (on-device control).AI servicesMCP serversDEVOn-device controlBRWBrowser extensionNETNetwork or SSE proxyGWYAI or MCP gatewayPOLPolicy: no product
  • Filled or hatched marker: Bay
  • Dashed teal ring: Prompt Security, described
  • DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
  • DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
  • DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
The map shows where each product's own pages describe a control, or where your answers point. It is not a measure of how well a product works.

What are the facts, side by side?

Bay and Prompt Security (SentinelOne), from each product's own pages. Differs is computed from recorded statuses, not wording.
FactBayPrompt Security
OwnerNoneSentinelOne (acquisition announced 5 August 2025; SentinelOne's blog of 3 September 2025 is titled SentinelOne Acquires Prompt Security)
PositioningAn endpoint-first control layer for AI agents, coding assistants and MCP servers on employee devices. Bay describes itself as a fully preventive, agentless platform that classifies, governs and prevents risks across every AI agent and tool on enterprise endpoints.Prompt Security, now part of SentinelOne, inventories AI tools and code assistants, including unsanctioned shadow AI, through two local sensors, a browser extension and a dedicated AI endpoint agent, and is built into the SentinelOne Singularity Platform.
How it reaches devicesDeploys through your existing EDR or MDM, with no new agents and no new tools; Bay says it scans in minutes and exits cleanly.

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Two local sensors: a browser extension and a dedicated AI endpoint agent, managed from the SentinelOne Singularity Platform. Prompt Security argues that MDM or EDR integrations, which mostly run scripts periodically, are not enough.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

On-device controlDescribedInventories AI agents, MCP servers, tools, credentials and extensions on the device, and its Enforcer returns Allow, Ask or Deny locally on prompts, pre-tool calls and post-tool responses on supported agent surfaces. Delivered as Wave, an ephemeral binary that runs through your existing MDM or EDR. Policies can be scoped by agent, group, endpoint or device.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (re-read) · Read 11 Oct 2026

DescribedA dedicated AI endpoint agent detects new AI agents, skills and connectors and applies runtime policies; it names GitHub Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code among the code assistants it inventories.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Browser extensionDiffersNot in our sourcesNo browser extension is described. Bay's Application Control can allow or block browsers and extensions as applications, which is a device rule, not a control on what goes into browser AI.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (re-read) · Read 11 Oct 2026

DescribedA browser extension inspects prompts, redacts sensitive data and discovers shadow AI.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Network or SSE proxyNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
AI or MCP gatewayNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
Names the coding agents it coversMatchesManaged settings for Claude Code, Codex and Claude Desktop lock permission rules, preserve managed hooks, restrict MCP servers and constrain plugin sources.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking, an AI agent attack (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

MatchesNames GitHub Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Decides on a tool call before it runsDiffersMatchesEvaluates prompts, pre-tool calls and post-tool responses and returns Allow, Ask or Deny locally, which Bay states takes under 4ms with no cloud round-trip, on supported agent surfaces.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (re-read) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not in our sources
Controls what goes into browser AIDiffersNot in our sourcesMatchesThe browser extension inspects prompts and redacts sensitive data.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Rolls out through EDR or device management you runDiffersMatchesDeploys through your existing EDR or MDM; no new agents.

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

PartlyIts own agent and extension, managed in the SentinelOne console; it does not ride on other EDR or MDM tools.

Source: Prompt Security blog: browser and endpoint sensors · Read 11 Oct 2026

Can warn or ask instead of only blockingDiffersMatchesAsk is one of three answers, with Allow and Deny.

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Can block an agent, tool or actionDiffersMatchesDeny stops an action. Rules cover MCP servers (an allow or block list, and per-tool rules for read, create, update, delete and execute), applications, CLIs, browsers, IDEs and extensions, credentials and files, network egress allow lists, and capability rules such as shell execution, package installation and cloud CLIs.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking (re-read) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not in our sources
Has a watch-only or simulation modeDiffersMatchesSimulation Mode runs a rule without enforcing it.

Source: Bay blog: Ghostjacking, an AI agent attack (August 2026) · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Records who or what took each actionDiffersMatchesRecords who triggered an action, whether a human was involved, and the chain from prompt to system action.

Source: Bay homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIDiffersNot in our sourcesMatchesCovers homegrown AI apps from testing to runtime.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace)Not in our sourcesNot in our sources
Built intoNoneBuilt into the SentinelOne Singularity Platform.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Works withNone in our sourcesNone in our sources
PriceNot published. Bay's site has a demo request and no pricing page (re-checked 11 October 2026).

Source: Bay homepage (re-read) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not published.

Source: SentinelOne: Prompt Security · Read 27 Sep 2026

Where do they differ?

  • Browser extension: Bay is not in our sources; Prompt Security describes it.
  • Decides on a tool call before it runs: Bay matches; Prompt Security is not in our sources.
  • Controls what goes into browser AI: Bay is not in our sources; Prompt Security matches.
  • Rolls out through EDR or device management you run: Bay matches; Prompt Security partly matches.
  • Can warn or ask instead of only blocking: Bay matches; Prompt Security is not in our sources.
  • Can block an agent, tool or action: Bay matches; Prompt Security is not in our sources.
  • Has a watch-only or simulation mode: Bay matches; Prompt Security is not in our sources.
  • Records who or what took each action: Bay matches; Prompt Security is not in our sources.
  • Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AI: Bay is not in our sources; Prompt Security matches.

Choose Bay if

  • Your developers run coding agents with many MCP servers and you want a decision on each action before it runs
  • You want to add AI agent control through the EDR or MDM you already run instead of rolling out another agent

Choose Prompt Security if

  • You already run SentinelOne Singularity
  • You need an inventory of AI tools and coding assistants first

Which limits should you check?

Bay

  • Endpoint only: no browser extension, network proxy or AI gateway is described, and nothing on SaaS or cloud-hosted AI apps.
  • One of the smallest public footprints here: a single homepage, two blog posts, no documentation portal and no published pricing (re-checked 11 October 2026).
  • Headline figures such as under 5 minutes to deploy, under 1% false positives and 100% of shadow AI discovered are Bay's own statements and have not been verified.

Prompt Security

  • Two new local sensors to roll out, a browser extension and an endpoint agent, unless you already run SentinelOne.
  • Tool-call decisions, blocking, warning and activity records for agent actions are not described on the pages we read, and no pricing is published.

Questions people ask

Is Bay or Prompt Security better for AI endpoint control?

Neither is scored on this site. Bay describes 1 of four product control types and Prompt Security 2 on the pages we read, and they differ on 9 recorded facts. Which fits depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, where the work happens and whether you block or guide; the finder checks those.

Which of the two decides on a tool call before it runs?

Bay: Matches. Prompt Security: Not in our sources. Warn or ask: Bay Matches, Prompt Security Not in our sources.

Do Bay or Prompt Security publish prices?

Bay: Not published. Bay's site has a demo request and no pricing page (re-checked 11 October 2026). Prompt Security: Not published.