Skip to content
Endpoint AI Finder

HEAD-TO-HEAD · FACTS ONLY

Workforce Protector vs Onyx: AI endpoint control facts side by side

Short answer

Workforce Protector describes 1 of the four product control types on the pages we read and Onyx describes 3; they differ on on-device control and AI or MCP gateway. On decisions, Workforce Protector describes some control over tool calls and Onyx decides on a tool call before it runs. We do not score either; the right choice depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, your current stack and whether you block or guide.

By The Device Desk · Endpoint AI Finder · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Vendor pages read September and October 2026 · updated 2026-10-13

Where do their controls sit?

Workforce Protector: described at 1 of 4 product control positions (browser extension), partly at 1 (on-device control).AI servicesMCP serversDEVOn-device controlBRWBrowser extensionNETNetwork or SSE proxyGWYAI or MCP gatewayPOLPolicy: no product
  • Filled or hatched marker: Workforce Protector
  • Dashed teal ring: Onyx, described
  • DEV Filled marker: described on the product pages we read
  • DEV Hatched marker: partly described (another component, a narrower scope, or method not detailed)
  • DEV Dashed marker: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
The map shows where each product's own pages describe a control, or where your answers point. It is not a measure of how well a product works.

What are the facts, side by side?

Akamai Workforce Protector and Onyx Security, from each product's own pages. Differs is computed from recorded statuses, not wording.
FactWorkforce ProtectorOnyx
OwnerAkamai (formerly LayerX; acquisition date not stated on the page)None
PositioningAkamai Workforce Protector, formerly LayerX, is a browser extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari that controls prompts, responses, agent actions and data exchanges across AI, SaaS, web and desktop applications, including agentic browsers and AI assistants, without proxies or a browser replacement."The Secure AI Control Plane for the Agentic Era": inline inspection of prompts, tool calls and model responses across browser AI, coding assistants, desktop AI agents, cloud workloads and MCP servers. Based in Tel Aviv and New York.
How it reaches devicesA browser extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari; Akamai says it needs no proxies and no browser replacement.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Endpoint agents, browser extensions, APIs and gateways.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

On-device controlDiffersPartly describedThe page says its controls reach desktop applications; how that works on the device is not described on the page we read.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

DescribedEndpoint agents cover coding assistants and desktop AI agents.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Browser extensionDescribedA browser extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari that controls prompts, responses, agent actions and data exchanges.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

DescribedBrowser extensions cover browser AI.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Network or SSE proxyNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.Not in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.
AI or MCP gatewayDiffersNot in our sourcesNot described on the pages we read.DescribedGateways and APIs inspect traffic inline.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Names the coding agents it coversDiffersNot in our sourcesPartlyCovers coding assistants; specific tools are not named on the pages we read.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Decides on a tool call before it runsDiffersPartlyControls agent actions, including in agentic browsers; decisions on coding agent tool calls are not described.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

MatchesInspects every prompt, tool call and model response inline.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Controls what goes into browser AIMatchesControls prompts and data exchanges, with warn, redact, block and guide.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

MatchesCan mask data in browser AI as well as block it.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Rolls out through EDR or device management you runNot in our sourcesNot in our sources
Can warn or ask instead of only blockingMatchesWarn and guide are actions alongside redact and block.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

MatchesFive actions: alert, block, mask, steer or ask.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Can block an agent, tool or actionMatchesBlock is one of its actions.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

MatchesBlock is one of five actions.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Has a watch-only or simulation modeDiffersNot in our sourcesPartlyAlert is one of five actions; a simulation mode is not described.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Records who or what took each actionDiffersNot in our sourcesPartlyIntegrates with Okta, Entra and Splunk; separating a person from an agent is not described.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AIDiffersPartlyCovers AI inside SaaS and web applications through the browser.

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

MatchesCloud workloads and MCP servers as well as devices.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Has a public price or tiers (vendor site or marketplace)Not in our sourcesNot in our sources
Built intoNoneNone
Works withNone in our sourcesLists CrowdStrike among its integrations.

Source: Onyx Security: AI security platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

PriceNot published (demo request only).

Source: Akamai Workforce Protector (formerly LayerX) · Read 11 Oct 2026

Not published.

Source: Onyx Security homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Where do they differ?

  • On-device control: Workforce Protector partly describes it; Onyx describes it.
  • AI or MCP gateway: Workforce Protector is not in our sources; Onyx describes it.
  • Names the coding agents it covers: Workforce Protector is not in our sources; Onyx partly matches.
  • Decides on a tool call before it runs: Workforce Protector partly matches; Onyx matches.
  • Has a watch-only or simulation mode: Workforce Protector is not in our sources; Onyx partly matches.
  • Records who or what took each action: Workforce Protector is not in our sources; Onyx partly matches.
  • Also covers SaaS, cloud or homegrown AI: Workforce Protector partly matches; Onyx matches.

Choose Workforce Protector if

  • Most AI use happens in browsers and you want to warn, redact or guide rather than block
  • People use agentic browsers or AI assistants inside SaaS apps

Choose Onyx if

  • You want masking or steering rather than only allow or block
  • AI use spans the browser, desktop apps, coding tools and cloud workloads

Which limits should you check?

Workforce Protector

  • Coding agents in a terminal and MCP servers on the device are not described on the page we read.
  • The acquisition date is not stated on the page, and no pricing is published.

Onyx

  • Uses its own endpoint agents and browser extensions, so there is something new to roll out to devices.
  • No pricing published, and specific coding agents are not named on the pages we read.

Questions people ask

Is Workforce Protector or Onyx better for AI endpoint control?

Neither is scored on this site. Workforce Protector describes 1 of four product control types and Onyx 3 on the pages we read, and they differ on 7 recorded facts. Which fits depends on the AI tools people use, your devices, where the work happens and whether you block or guide; the finder checks those.

Which of the two decides on a tool call before it runs?

Workforce Protector: Partly. Onyx: Matches. Warn or ask: Workforce Protector Matches, Onyx Matches.

Do Workforce Protector or Onyx publish prices?

Workforce Protector: Not published (demo request only). Onyx: Not published.